Making systematic reviews impactful through knowledge-translation strategies and tools

Session: 

Workshop session 1: Wednesday, 11:00-12:30

Workshop category: 

  • Evidence tools for policy makers and civil society
Status

ID: 

WS8
Date and Location

Date: 

Wednesday 13 September 2017 - 11:00 to 12:30

Location: 

Contact persons and facilitators

Contact person:

Facilitators: 

Fadi El-Jardali
Racha Fadlallah
Tamara Lotfi
Lama Bou-Karroum
Elie Akl
Nour Hemadi
Andrea Darzi

Acknowledgements:

Target audience

Target audience: 

Evidence Synthesis teams

Level of difficulty: 

Basic
Type of workshop

Type of workshop : 

Training
Abstract

Abstract:

The Global Evidence Synthesis Initiative (GESI) was launched to enhance capacity to undertake evidence syntheses and support their use in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and is hosted by the Centre for Systematic Reviews on Health Policy and Systems Research (SPARK) at the American University of Beirut. This workshop is in collaboration with the Knowledge to Policy (K2P) Center at the American University of Beirut. K2P is a WHO collaborating center for Evidence-Informed Policy and Practice.

Objectives:
To understand the role of systematic reviews in evidence-informed policy making;
To familiarise participants with commonly used Knowledge Translation (KT) strategies and tools to package research evidence and support its use in policy decision making;
To understand how to apply different KT products to promote evidence-informed policy making.
Description:
• Short interactive presentation on policy making and role of policy-relevant systematic reviews (10 minutes);
• Short interactive presentation on existing KT approaches, tools and platforms to promote use of evidence in policy making (10 minutes);
• Hands-on exercise on selected KT products (Evidence Briefs for Policy, Briefing Notes, Rapid Response Products, Support Summaries, and Media Bites) (60 minutes):
o Identifying the characteristics of selected KT products, how they differ from systematic reviews and from each other, and their applicability;
• Reflections and group discussions (10 minutes).