WikiRecs and BMJ RapidRecs: rapid and trustworthy recommendations that provide ingredients and tools for shared decision making




Long oral session 5: KT to promote EBDM


Wednesday 13 September 2017 - 14:00 to 15:30


All authors in correct order:

Agoritsas T1, Siemieniuk R2, Lytvyn L3, Brandt L4, Macdonald H5, Loder E5, Stahl-Timmins W5, Heen A6, Achille F3, Iorio A2, Guyatt G2, Vandvik P6
1 University Hospitals of Geneva, Switzerland
2 McMaster University, Canada
3 MAGIC organization, Oslo, Norway
4 University of Oslo, Canada
5 The BMJ, UK
6 University of Oslo, Norway
Presenting author and contact person

Presenting author:

Thomas Agoritsas

Contact person:

Abstract text
Background: It often takes years before practice-changing evidence published in randomised trials reaches patients in routine clinical practice. Contributing factors include the prolonged time it takes for guideline organisations to update their recommendations, and lack of supporting tools for shared decision making. In response, we have created WikiRECS, including the pre-eminent BMJ RapidRecs project.

Objectives: Faced with potentially practice-changing evidence, we aim to, within 90 days, create and disseminate trustworthy recommendations, evidence summaries and consultation decision aids addressing important topics in: 1) a novel, user-friendly, single-page synopsis format; and, 2) digitally structured multi-layered presentation formats on the MagicApp (

Methods: We screen new evidence daily through a tailored system, developed in partnership with McMasterPLUS, that identifies the most relevant and newsworthy research. After a topic is chosen, we recruit a full guideline panel with no relevant financial and minimal intellectual interests. The panel, including patients, content experts, methodologists and frontline clinicians finalise the PICO question. A parallel team performs systematic reviews addressing relative effects, baseline risk, and values and preferences as necessary, within 45 days. The panel then considers the evidence and makes recommendations. GRADE and IOM standards provide a framework for each step in the process. The recommendation and evidence synopsis, and its supporting systematic reviews, is published in one or more journal(s).
Results: In the first 6 months, we have completed 3 BMJ RapidRecs, 2 WikiRecs, with several more planned or in preparation. All supporting evidence is accompanied by interactive infographics, GRADE summary of findings, and decision aids for the clinical encounter.
Conclusion: Multidisciplinary teams can produce trustworthy recommendations, presented in understandable formats that are easily accessible by patients and clinicians, in a very short timeframe. This approach demonstrates potential synergies between evidence synthesis, appraisal and dissemination within the evidence ecosystem.