Evidence supporting the shortened dental arch for under-privileged South Africans




Poster session 4 Saturday: Evidence implementation and evaluation


Saturday 16 September 2017 - 12:30 to 14:00


All authors in correct order:

Khan S1, Chikte U2, Omar R3
1 University of the Western cape, South Africa
2 Stellenbosch University, South Africa
3 Kuwait University, Sout
Presenting author and contact person

Presenting author:

Saadika Khan

Contact person:

Abstract text
Background: Global evidence suggests that shortened or posteriorly reduced dental arches (SDA or PRDA) are adequate for functioning and may benefit resource-restrained communities. This concept has been embedded within the National Oral Health Policy of South Africa since 1994, though no contextual evidence guided its inclusion to inform this policy. The teachings and clinical practices also lack explicit reference to such a beneficial concept.

Objectives: To provide evidence that support a functional dentition represented by a shortened dental arch, minimising expensive prosthodontic interventions for South African communities.

Methods: A step-wise approach in study designs was implemented amongst a South African cohort. A systematic review, followed by an overview of systematic reviews was conducted to guide researchers with the literature and provide a scaffold for the cross-sectional questionnaires and cross-sectional clinical study for this cohort. These studies were completed with general dental practitioners, clinical teachers and dental students to determine what was currently taught and clinically practiced. A follow-up randomised-controlled trial was subsequently conducted to determine patient satisfaction and quality of life with a SDA or PRDA.

Results: Studies completed were from the top end of the hierarchical evidence pyramid; thus their results provided improved evidence related to reliability and validity and in support of the benefits of the SDA or PRDA. The generalisability of outcomes obtained related to settings, subject, intervention, results and costs which were acceptable for this cohort. Aspects of knowledge translation (KT) such as diffusion (creating awareness) and dissemination (publishing and conference presentations) were fulfilled.

Conclusions: This step-wise approach predominantly highlighted the absence of the implementation aspect of KT; that is the application of the SDA or PRDA concept to clinical practice which could positively impact patients’ treatment costs, satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life within the SA context.